Traditional SMTP providers like Mailgun and SendGrid are built for transactional email, not cold email infrastructure. Here's why businesses are switching to purpose-built cold email infrastructure and how ColdInbox API delivers what traditional providers can't.
The Traditional SMTP Trap
Most businesses start their cold email journey the same way: they Google "email API" and find Mailgun or SendGrid. These are household names in the developer community, with polished documentation and enterprise credibility.
Then reality hits:
Week 1: "Great, I can send emails through their API!"
Week 2: "Why is my deliverability so poor?"
Week 3: "How do I create multiple domains for cold email?"
Week 4: "This isn't working for cold email infrastructure at all."
According to Mailgun's own use case documentation, their platform is designed for "transactional emails, notifications, and bulk marketing." Cold email infrastructure isn't even mentioned.
The fundamental mismatch: Traditional SMTP providers solve transactional email problems (password resets, notifications, marketing to existing customers) while cold email requires infrastructure problems (domain management, inbox creation, reputation control).
This distinction matters more than most businesses realize.
Why Mailgun and SendGrid Fail for Cold Email
Mailgun: Built for Transactional, Not Infrastructure
Mailgun's Core Design:
- Purpose: Send emails through their infrastructure using your domain
- Model: Pay per email sent through their servers
- Focus: Deliverability for transactional and marketing emails to existing audiences
Where Mailgun Breaks for Cold Email:
1. No Inbox Creation Capabilities
What you need: 100 unique email addresses for cold outreach
What Mailgun provides: Sending capability from domains you verify
The gap: Cannot create actual inboxes/addresses programmatically
2. Shared Infrastructure Reputation
According to Mailgun's IP Management Guide, all users share IP reputation unless you pay for dedicated IPs.
- Problem: Your cold email reputation tied to other users' sending patterns
- Risk: Poor deliverability due to shared infrastructure abuse
- Cost: Dedicated IPs start at $59/month per IP
3. Domain Management Complexity
- Setup: Manual domain verification for each domain
- DNS: Complex SPF/DKIM configuration required for each domain
- Scaling: No programmatic domain management capabilities
- Problem: Managing 10+ domains becomes operationally unsustainable
4. Cold Email Pattern Detection
Mailgun's Terms of Service explicitly prohibit "unsolicited bulk email" which can include legitimate cold email.
- Risk: Account suspension for cold email patterns
- Problem: Platform not designed for cold outreach use cases
- Result: Businesses forced to hide legitimate cold email activity
Case Study: SaaS Company's Mailgun Struggle
- Background: B2B SaaS using Mailgun for lead generation outreach
- Setup: 5 domains, 50 sending addresses, $200/month Mailgun costs
- Problems:
- Cannot create actual inboxes, only sending aliases
- Shared IP reputation causing deliverability issues
- Manual domain management consuming 10+ hours/week
- Account warnings about "bulk email" patterns
- Resolution: Switched to ColdInbox API, reduced costs to $65/month with better functionality
- Lesson: Traditional SMTP providers solve different problems than cold email infrastructure
SendGrid: Enterprise Marketing, Not Cold Email Infrastructure
SendGrid's Core Design:
- Purpose: Enterprise email marketing and transactional email delivery
- Model: Complex pricing tiers based on email volume and features
- Focus: Marketing emails to existing customer databases
Where SendGrid Breaks for Cold Email:
1. Enterprise Marketing Focus
SendGrid's Marketing Campaigns documentation assumes you're sending to existing contacts/customers.
- Problem: No infrastructure for cold outreach scenarios
- Design: Built for permission-based marketing, not prospecting
- Compliance: Focused on CAN-SPAM for existing relationships, not cold outreach
2. No Infrastructure Creation Capabilities
Cold Email Infrastructure Needs:
β Create multiple domains programmatically
β Generate unique email addresses at scale
β Manage domain DNS automatically
β Create isolated sending environments
β Send emails (only capability SendGrid provides)
3. Complex Pricing for Simple Needs
SendGrid's pricing is designed for high-volume marketing:
- Essentials: $19.95/month for 50,000 emails
- Pro: $89.95/month for 100,000 emails
- Problem: You're paying for marketing features you don't need for cold email infrastructure
4. Shared Reputation Risks
According to SendGrid's IP Warm-up Guide, shared IP pools mean your reputation depends on other users.
- Risk: Cold email patterns may conflict with other users' marketing patterns
- Problem: Cannot isolate reputation for cold email vs. transactional email
- Solution: Dedicated IPs add significant cost complexity
Case Study: Agency's SendGrid Failure
- Background: Marketing agency managing 15 clients through SendGrid
- Challenge: Need separate email infrastructure for each client
- Problems:
- Cannot create separate email environments per client
- Shared reputation affecting all clients when one has issues
- Complex billing with features not needed for cold email
- No way to create actual email addresses, only sending aliases
- Impact: Lost 3 clients due to deliverability issues from shared infrastructure
- Lesson: SendGrid's enterprise marketing focus doesn't translate to cold email infrastructure needs
Purpose-Built Cold Email Infrastructure
What Cold Email Infrastructure Actually Requires
Infrastructure Creation, Not Just Sending:
Traditional SMTP providers focus on sending emails through existing infrastructure. Cold email requires creating the infrastructure itself.
Essential Cold Email Infrastructure Capabilities:
Domain Management:
β Programmatic domain creation and verification
β Automated DNS configuration (SPF, DKIM, DMARC)
β Unlimited domain support without per-domain costs
β Domain health monitoring and reputation tracking
Inbox Creation:
β Generate unique email addresses programmatically
β Create actual inboxes with SMTP credentials
β Manage inbox storage and access
β Support receiving emails, not just sending
Reputation Control:
β Isolated sending environments per campaign/client
β Individual inbox reputation management
β No shared infrastructure reputation risks
β Cold email pattern optimization
API-First Architecture:
β Complete infrastructure management through APIs
β Real-time inbox creation and management
β Programmatic configuration and monitoring
β Integration flexibility with any platform
ColdInbox API: Built for Cold Email Infrastructure
Core Design Philosophy:
ColdInbox API is purpose-built for businesses that need to create and manage email infrastructure, not just send through existing infrastructure.
What Makes ColdInbox Different:
1. True Infrastructure Creation
# Create domain and inboxes programmatically
domain = coldinbox.create_domain("client-outreach.com")
inboxes = []
for name in ["sales", "outreach", "follow-up"]:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(f"{name}@client-outreach.com")
inboxes.append(inbox)
# Get SMTP credentials for any platform
for inbox in inboxes:
print(f"Email: {inbox.email}")
print(f"SMTP: {inbox.smtp_host}:{inbox.smtp_port}")
print(f"Credentials: {inbox.username}:{inbox.password}")
2. Unlimited Domain Management
- Create unlimited domains without per-domain costs
- Automated DNS configuration with calculated values
- Real-time domain verification and monitoring
- Domain health tracking and reputation management
3. Actual Inbox Creation
- Generate real email addresses with receiving capability
- SMTP credentials for each inbox (email + password)
- 30MB storage per inbox with receiving functionality
- API management of all inbox operations
4. Transparent, Scalable Pricing
Base Package: $25/month
β Unlimited domains
β 100 inboxes (30MB each)
β Unlimited receiving
β Full API access
Add-Ons:
β Additional inboxes: $10 per 50 inboxes
β Sending credits: $10 per 10,000 emails
β Pay only for what you need
Head-to-Head Feature Comparison
Infrastructure Creation Capabilities
Feature | Mailgun | SendGrid | ColdInbox API |
---|---|---|---|
Create Domains | Manual only | Manual only | β API + Dashboard |
Domain Limit | No limit (manual) | No limit (manual) | β Unlimited |
DNS Management | Manual setup | Manual setup | β Automated calculation |
Domain Verification | Manual process | Manual process | β Real-time API |
Create Email Addresses | β Aliases only | β Aliases only | β Real inboxes |
SMTP Credentials | β Use theirs | β Use theirs | β Individual per inbox |
Email Receiving | β Sending only | β Sending only | β Full inbox functionality |
API Infrastructure Control | β Limited | β Limited | β Complete |
Cold Email Specific Features
Feature | Mailgun | SendGrid | ColdInbox API |
---|---|---|---|
Multi-Domain Strategy | Complex setup | Complex setup | β Built-in support |
Inbox Isolation | β Shared infrastructure | β Shared infrastructure | β Individual inboxes |
Reputation Control | β Shared (unless dedicated IP) | β Shared (unless dedicated IP) | β Per-inbox control |
Cold Email Patterns | β οΈ Policy restrictions | β οΈ Policy restrictions | β Designed for cold email |
Platform Integration | Limited | Limited | β Any SMTP platform |
Warmup Compatibility | Manual setup | Manual setup | β Ready for warmup tools |
Developer Experience
Feature | Mailgun | SendGrid | ColdInbox API |
---|---|---|---|
API Documentation | β Excellent | β Excellent | β Comprehensive |
Setup Complexity | High (domain setup) | High (domain setup) | β Simple |
Time to First Inbox | Days (domain verification) | Days (domain verification) | β Minutes |
Bulk Operations | Limited | Limited | β Full API support |
Real-time Creation | β | β | β Instant inbox creation |
Webhook Support | β | β | β |
Real-World Cost Analysis
Scenario 1: Small Agency (150 inboxes, 20,000 emails/month)
Mailgun Setup:
Mailgun Costs:
- Flex plan: $35/month for 50K emails (overkill)
- Dedicated IP: $59/month (needed for reputation control)
- Domain setup: Manual labor (10+ hours)
- Problem: Cannot create actual inboxes
Total: $94/month + cannot achieve required functionality
SendGrid Setup:
SendGrid Costs:
- Essentials: $19.95/month for 50K emails
- Dedicated IP: $30/month
- Additional features: $20/month for needed capabilities
- Problem: Cannot create actual inboxes
Total: $69.95/month + cannot achieve required functionality
ColdInbox API Setup:
ColdInbox Costs:
- Base plan: $25/month (100 inboxes + unlimited domains)
- Additional inboxes: $10/month (50 more inboxes)
- Sending credits: $20/month (20K emails)
Total: $55/month with complete functionality
Winner: ColdInbox API - 42% cheaper than Mailgun, 21% cheaper than SendGrid, plus actually provides required infrastructure capabilities.
Scenario 2: Growing SaaS (500 inboxes, 100,000 emails/month)
Mailgun Setup:
Mailgun Costs:
- Flex plan: $80/month for 100K emails
- Multiple dedicated IPs: $177/month (3 IPs for reputation distribution)
- Advanced features: $50/month
- Problem: Still cannot create actual inboxes
Total: $307/month + incomplete functionality
SendGrid Setup:
SendGrid Costs:
- Pro plan: $89.95/month for 100K emails
- Dedicated IPs: $90/month (3 IPs)
- Marketing campaigns: $60/month
- Problem: Still cannot create actual inboxes
Total: $239.95/month + incomplete functionality
ColdInbox API Setup:
ColdInbox Costs:
- Base plan: $25/month (100 inboxes)
- Additional inboxes: $80/month (400 more inboxes)
- Sending credits: $100/month (100K emails)
Total: $205/month with complete functionality
Winner: ColdInbox API - 33% cheaper than Mailgun, 15% cheaper than SendGrid, plus provides complete cold email infrastructure.
Scenario 3: Enterprise Agency (1,000+ inboxes, 500,000 emails/month)
Traditional SMTP Provider Issues:
- Cost explosion: $500-1,500/month for volume and dedicated resources
- Operational complexity: Managing hundreds of domains manually
- Incomplete functionality: Still cannot create actual inbox infrastructure
- Reputation risks: Shared infrastructure affecting all clients
ColdInbox API:
ColdInbox Costs:
- Base plan: $25/month
- Additional inboxes: $180/month (900 more inboxes)
- Sending credits: $500/month (500K emails)
Total: $705/month with complete infrastructure control
Additional ColdInbox Benefits:
- Unlimited domains (vs. complex domain management)
- Complete infrastructure control via API
- Individual inbox reputation management
- Purpose-built for cold email patterns and compliance
Technical Capabilities That Matter
API Architecture Comparison
Mailgun API Limitations:
# What Mailgun API can do
mailgun.messages.send({
"from": "sales@yourdomain.com", # Must be manually configured
"to": "prospect@example.com",
"subject": "Hello",
"text": "Your message"
})
# What Mailgun API cannot do
β Create domains programmatically
β Generate email addresses/inboxes
β Get SMTP credentials for created addresses
β Manage inbox storage or receiving
SendGrid API Limitations:
# What SendGrid API can do
sendgrid.send({
"from": {"email": "sales@yourdomain.com"}, # Must be manually configured
"to": [{"email": "prospect@example.com"}],
"subject": "Hello",
"content": [{"type": "text/plain", "value": "Your message"}]
})
# What SendGrid API cannot do
β Create domains programmatically
β Generate email addresses/inboxes
β Provide individual SMTP credentials
β Create receiving infrastructure
ColdInbox API Capabilities:
# Complete infrastructure management
import coldinbox
# Create domain
domain = coldinbox.create_domain("client-outreach.com")
print(f"Domain created: {domain.name}")
print(f"DNS Records: {domain.dns_records}")
# Create inboxes
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox("sales@client-outreach.com")
print(f"Email: {inbox.email}")
print(f"SMTP Host: {inbox.smtp_host}")
print(f"SMTP Port: {inbox.smtp_port}")
print(f"Username: {inbox.username}")
print(f"Password: {inbox.password}")
# Use with any platform
smtp_config = {
"host": inbox.smtp_host,
"port": inbox.smtp_port,
"username": inbox.email,
"password": inbox.password
}
# Works with Smartlead, Instantly, Apollo, custom scripts, etc.
Integration Flexibility
Traditional SMTP Provider Integration:
- Limited to their infrastructure: Must send through their servers
- Complex authentication: API keys, webhook validation, platform-specific setup
- Vendor lock-in: Difficult to migrate or use multiple providers
ColdInbox API Integration:
- Standard SMTP output: Works with any email platform or tool
- Platform agnostic: Use with Smartlead, Instantly, Apollo, custom solutions
- Easy migration: Standard SMTP credentials work anywhere
- Multi-platform: Use same infrastructure across different tools
Authentication and Security
Email Authentication Comparison:
Mailgun:
- SPF: Must manually configure for each domain
- DKIM: Generated after manual domain verification
- DMARC: Manual policy creation and management
- Problem: Complex setup for multiple domains
SendGrid:
- SPF: Manual configuration with SendGrid includes
- DKIM: Automatic after domain verification
- DMARC: Manual policy management
- Problem: Enterprise-focused, complex for cold email needs
ColdInbox:
- SPF: Automatically calculated and provided
- DKIM: Automatically configured for each domain
- DMARC: Optional policies provided
- Benefit: Automated authentication setup for rapid deployment
Use Cases Where ColdInbox Wins
Use Case 1: Multi-Client Agency
The Challenge:
Marketing agency managing 20 clients, each needing separate email infrastructure for reputation isolation.
Traditional SMTP Failure:
Mailgun/SendGrid Approach:
- 20 separate accounts (complex billing)
- Manual domain setup for each client (weeks of setup time)
- Shared reputation risks affecting all clients
- Cannot create actual client email addresses
- Complex client onboarding (3-4 weeks per client)
ColdInbox Solution:
# Rapid client onboarding
def onboard_client(client_name):
# Create client domains
domains = []
for campaign in ["outreach", "follow-up", "nurture"]:
domain = coldinbox.create_domain(f"{client_name}-{campaign}.com")
domains.append(domain)
# Create inbox infrastructure
inboxes = []
for domain in domains:
for role in ["sales", "bd", "outreach"]:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(f"{role}@{domain.name}")
inboxes.append(inbox)
return {
"client": client_name,
"domains": len(domains),
"inboxes": len(inboxes),
"status": "ready_for_campaigns",
"setup_time": "< 1 hour"
}
# Client ready same day vs. weeks with traditional providers
Results:
- Setup time: 1 hour vs. 3-4 weeks
- Cost: $65/month vs. $200+ per client
- Reputation isolation: Each client has separate infrastructure
- Client satisfaction: Immediate campaign launch capability
Use Case 2: SaaS Company Scaling Outbound
The Challenge:
B2B SaaS company scaling from 1,000 to 50,000 emails/month across multiple market segments.
Traditional SMTP Scaling Issues:
SendGrid Scaling Problems:
- Volume pricing doesn't match infrastructure needs
- Cannot create segment-specific email infrastructure
- Shared reputation as volume increases
- No programmatic infrastructure management
- Complex billing for simple infrastructure needs
ColdInbox Scaling Solution:
# Scale infrastructure with business growth
def scale_outbound_infrastructure(segments):
infrastructure = {}
for segment in segments:
# Create segment-specific domains
domain = coldinbox.create_domain(f"{segment.lower()}-outreach.saas.com")
# Create role-based inboxes
inboxes = []
for role in ["founder", "sales", "marketing"]:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(f"{role}@{domain.name}")
inboxes.append(inbox)
infrastructure[segment] = {
"domain": domain,
"inboxes": inboxes,
"ready_for": "immediate_campaigns"
}
return infrastructure
# Scale from 3 to 15 market segments in hours, not months
Business Impact:
- Time to market: Hours vs. months for new segment launch
- Cost efficiency: Pay only for infrastructure used
- Reputation control: Segment isolation prevents cross-contamination
- Technical flexibility: API-driven scaling matches business growth
Use Case 3: Enterprise Multi-Geographic Expansion
The Challenge:
Enterprise company expanding to 12 new countries, each requiring localized email infrastructure with country-specific domains.
Traditional Provider Complexity:
Mailgun/SendGrid Enterprise Issues:
- Complex enterprise contracts and pricing
- Manual setup for each geographic region
- Shared infrastructure across all regions
- Complex compliance for international operations
- Weeks of setup per country
ColdInbox Enterprise Solution:
# Rapid international expansion
def deploy_global_infrastructure(countries):
global_setup = {}
for country in countries:
# Create country-specific infrastructure
domain = coldinbox.create_domain(f"sales-{country['code']}.company.com")
# Create local team inboxes
team_inboxes = []
for position in country['sales_roles']:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(f"{position}@{domain.name}")
team_inboxes.append(inbox)
global_setup[country['name']] = {
"domain": domain,
"team": team_inboxes,
"launch_ready": True,
"setup_time": "< 30 minutes"
}
return global_setup
# 12 countries ready in 6 hours vs. 6 months
Enterprise Benefits:
- Rapid expansion: New countries online same day
- Cost predictability: Transparent add-on pricing vs. complex enterprise contracts
- Compliance simplicity: Country-specific infrastructure isolation
- Operational efficiency: API-driven management vs. manual processes
Migration Strategies
From Mailgun to ColdInbox
Assessment Phase:
Current Mailgun Usage Audit:
β‘ List all domains currently configured
β‘ Identify sending addresses in use
β‘ Calculate monthly email volume
β‘ Review current DNS configurations
β‘ Document existing integrations
Migration Strategy:
# Parallel setup approach
def migrate_from_mailgun():
# Phase 1: Create equivalent infrastructure
for domain in mailgun_domains:
new_domain = coldinbox.create_domain(domain.name)
# Create inboxes for existing sending addresses
for address in domain.sending_addresses:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(address)
# Test with small volume
print(f"Created: {inbox.email}")
print(f"SMTP: {inbox.smtp_credentials}")
# Phase 2: Gradual traffic migration
# Phase 3: DNS cutover
# Phase 4: Mailgun decommission
Timeline: 1-2 weeks vs. months with other providers
From SendGrid to ColdInbox
Enterprise Migration Considerations:
SendGrid Enterprise Assessment:
β‘ Review current contract terms and exit clauses
β‘ Audit marketing campaigns vs. cold email usage
β‘ Identify dedicated IP configurations
β‘ Document complex integrations
β‘ Plan gradual volume migration
Technical Migration:
# SendGrid replacement strategy
def replace_sendgrid_infrastructure():
# Identify cold email specific needs
cold_email_domains = filter_cold_email_domains(sendgrid_domains)
for domain in cold_email_domains:
# Create cold email infrastructure
new_domain = coldinbox.create_domain(domain.name)
# Create inboxes for cold email addresses
for address in domain.cold_email_addresses:
inbox = coldinbox.create_inbox(address)
# Ready for immediate use
configure_in_existing_platform(inbox.smtp_credentials)
Migration Benefits:
- Cost reduction: 30-60% savings on cold email infrastructure
- Functionality improvement: Actual infrastructure vs. sending-only
- Operational simplification: API-driven vs. enterprise complexity
Hybrid Approaches
Best of Both Worlds Strategy:
Hybrid Infrastructure Architecture:
- Traditional SMTP: Transactional emails (password resets, notifications)
- ColdInbox API: Cold email infrastructure (prospecting, outreach)
- Benefits: Optimized costs and capabilities for each use case
Implementation:
# Route emails based on purpose
def route_email_infrastructure(email_type, content):
if email_type == "transactional":
# Use Mailgun/SendGrid for transactional
return send_via_mailgun(content)
elif email_type == "cold_outreach":
# Use ColdInbox for cold email infrastructure
return send_via_coldinbox(content)
elif email_type == "marketing":
# Use appropriate provider for marketing
return send_via_marketing_platform(content)
Hybrid Benefits:
- Cost optimization: Pay for appropriate capabilities
- Functionality maximization: Use best tool for each purpose
- Risk mitigation: Diversified infrastructure reduces single-point failures
Making the Right Choice
Decision Framework
When to Use Traditional SMTP Providers:
Mailgun is right if:
- Primary need is transactional email (password resets, notifications)
- Sending to existing customers/users only
- No need for infrastructure creation or management
- Comfortable with manual domain setup and management
SendGrid is right if:
- Primary need is enterprise marketing campaigns
- Large-scale marketing to existing customer databases
- Need enterprise-grade marketing features and analytics
- Have dedicated team for complex setup and management
ColdInbox is right if:
- Need to create email infrastructure, not just send emails
- Doing cold outreach, prospecting, or lead generation
- Require multiple domains and inbox management
- Want API-driven infrastructure control
- Need cost-effective scaling for cold email volume
Technical Requirements Assessment
Infrastructure Creation Needs:
Do you need to:
β‘ Create multiple domains programmatically?
β‘ Generate email addresses at scale?
β‘ Manage inbox infrastructure via API?
β‘ Control reputation per domain/inbox?
β‘ Integrate with cold email platforms?
If yes to any: ColdInbox API
If no to all: Traditional SMTP may work
Volume and Cost Considerations:
Volume Analysis:
- <10,000 emails/month: Any provider works cost-wise
- 10,000-100,000 emails/month: ColdInbox API provides best value
- >100,000 emails/month: ColdInbox API essential for cost control
Infrastructure Needs:
- <10 domains: Manual setup feasible
- 10-50 domains: API management becomes essential
- >50 domains: Only API-driven solutions viable
Business Context Factors
Agency and Service Provider Needs:
- Client separation: Individual infrastructure per client
- Rapid onboarding: Same-day client setup capability
- Transparent billing: Simple, predictable costs
- Reputation isolation: Problems with one client don't affect others
- Winner: ColdInbox API
SaaS and Technology Company Needs:
- Technical integration: API-first architecture
- Scaling flexibility: Infrastructure that grows with business
- Developer experience: Clean APIs and documentation
- Platform independence: Not locked into specific providers
- Winner: ColdInbox API
Enterprise Needs:
- Compliance control: Data location and processing control
- Cost predictability: Transparent pricing without complex contracts
- Operational efficiency: Automated infrastructure management
- Integration flexibility: Works with existing technology stacks
- Winner: ColdInbox API (with hybrid approach for other email types)
The Bottom Line
The choice between Mailgun, SendGrid, and ColdInbox API isn't just about features or costβit's about whether you need email sending capabilities or email infrastructure capabilities.
Traditional SMTP providers excel at:
- Sending emails through their infrastructure
- Transactional email reliability
- Enterprise marketing campaigns
- High-volume email delivery
ColdInbox API excels at:
- Creating email infrastructure programmatically
- Cold email specific optimization
- Multi-domain management at scale
- Cost-effective infrastructure control
The data is clear:
For Cold Email Infrastructure:
- ColdInbox API: Purpose-built solution with 30-60% cost savings
- Traditional SMTP: Wrong tool for the job, higher costs, missing functionality
For Transactional Email:
- Traditional SMTP: Proven solutions for existing use cases
- ColdInbox API: Overkill for simple transactional needs
For Hybrid Operations:
- Best approach: Use each tool for its intended purpose
- ColdInbox: Cold email infrastructure
- Traditional SMTP: Transactional emails
- Result: Optimized costs and maximum functionality
The businesses winning at cold email are those using purpose-built infrastructure rather than forcing transactional email tools into cold email use cases.
Ready to switch from traditional SMTP limitations to purpose-built cold email infrastructure?
Experience the difference of infrastructure designed specifically for cold email success.
Compare your options:
- ColdInbox API Documentation - See complete technical capabilities
- Why businesses switch from Gmail/Outlook - Traditional provider limitations
- Cold email compliance requirements - Legal considerations for infrastructure choice
- Infrastructure comparison guide - See how all providers stack up
Because your cold email success shouldn't be limited by infrastructure designed for different use cases.
External resources referenced: